Home / Docs-Technical WhitePaper / 53-Model Card Template v1.0
Chapter 12 — Monitoring, Drift & Rollback
I. Purpose & Scope
- Standardize deployment monitoring, drift detection, and rollback metrics, thresholds, workflows, and release conventions so failures/mismatches are detected early, safely degraded, and auditable for rollback.
- For path quantities (arrival time/phase), the text must explicitly show gamma(ell) and d ell; the data side records delta_form ∈ {general, factored}; all expressions are parenthesized; publication requires p_dim = 1.0.
II. Prerequisites & Inputs
- Data & splits: align with Dataset Card Ch. 4/6/7/11 (Schema/Splits/QC/Bench); online sampling consistent with offline evaluation.
- Training & deployment: align with this volume Ch. 6 (Training) and Ch. 10 (Deployment Interfaces); best.ckpt and env snapshot locked.
- Coverage & covariance: align with Error Budget (coverage ∈ {k, alpha, quantile}, Σ PD).
- Parameter freshness: align with Parameter Card (freshness.policy, cov_group).
- Citations & versions: “volume + version + anchor (P/S/M/I)”, anchor coverage ≥ 90%; public v1.* only.
III. Monitoring KPIs & Thresholds
- Data plane: distribution drift (KS/ψ/EMD), missing & anomaly rates, path consistency (len(gamma_ell)=len(d_ell)=len(n_eff)≥2, Δell ≤ ( c_ref / f_s ) / max(n_eff)).
- Model plane: Q_res, r_phi, ε_flux, p_dim (=1), predictive uncertainty U=k·u_c or quantile coverage.
- Timebase & sync: clock_state, δt_abs, Δτ_ch, σ_y(τ).
- Resources & performance: Latency_P95/P99, Throughput, ρ, P_avg/energy_per_req, loss_rate.
- Threshold mapping: align with Ch. 8/11 and Error Budget Ch. 9; breaches trigger degrade/rollback.
IV. Drift Detection
- Data drift:
- Tests: KS/χ²/AD; multivariate MMD/Energy distance; windowed stratification (batch/device/region).
- Path quantities: interval coverage & band-width trends for T_arr/Phi; align phase within reference window first.
- Concept drift:
- Proxy ground truth / delayed labels: align online feedback with val/test/holdout.
- Performance decay: ΔMAE/ΔAUC/Δr_phi over thresholds with non-overlapping CIs.
- Uncertainty calibration: PIT/calibration curves/Brier; on failure, enable conservative intervals or robust surrogates.
V. Rollback Mechanism
- FSM: normal → degrade → rollback → recover → normal, event-driven (gate breach/drift confirmed/resource alerts).
- Degrade:
- Model: route to lower-complexity path / robust surrogates (Huber/quantile).
- Data: tighten gates, isolate risky slices.
- Path: switch to fullband/short window or raise Δell guard (without breaking upper bounds).
- Rollback execution: lock previous stable version (signature & checksum), keep I/O contract & coverage mode unchanged.
- Recovery & verification: progressive canary rollout; after /validate passes G1–G8 and perf/quality thresholds, switch fully.
VI. Normative Path Forms
- Arrival (two equivalent):
T_arr = ( 1 / c_ref ) * ( ∫ n_eff d ell )
T_arr = ( ∫ ( n_eff / c_ref ) d ell ) - Phase accumulation:
Phi = ( 2π / λ_ref ) * ( ∫ n_eff d ell )
Align “time → path → phase” before monitoring & alerts; record delta_form; arrays satisfy length & step constraints.
VII. Gate Mapping
- G1 Schema completeness (monitoring/drift report fields present).
- G2 Citation compliance (anchor coverage ≥ 90%).
- G3 Path conventions (blocks complete; step compliant).
- G4 Dimensional closure (online/offline calculations keep p_dim = 1.0).
- G5 Freshness (clock_state="locked").
- G6 Coverage consistency (online intervals match publication k/alpha/quantile).
- G7 Covariance consistency (Σ PD, aligned with Error Budget).
- G8 Uniqueness & acyclicity (events/artifacts with checksum, lineage acyclic).
- Trigger S1–S5 (dimension/freshness/path/covariance/citation) to degrade/rollback; tag [Restricted] when applicable.
VIII. Machine-Readable Configs
A. monitoring_rules.yaml
version: "1.0.0"
windows: { short_s: 300, long_s: 86400 }
kpis:
latency_p95_s: { target: 0.200, alert: 0.250, critical: 0.300 }
throughput_rps: { target_min: 1000 }
q_res: { target_max: 0.20 }
p_dim: { require: 1.0 }
r_phi_lb95: { target_min: 0.60 }
epsilon_flux_p95: { target_max: 0.02 }
delta_t_abs_ns: { target_max: 50 }
delta_tau_ch_ns: { target_max: 5 }
drift:
data: { test: "ks", p_crit: 0.01, strata: ["device","region"] }
concept: { metric: "val/MAE", delta_crit: 0.05, ci_agree: true }
actions:
on_alert: ["degrade"]
on_critical: ["rollback"]
B. rollback_fsm.yaml
version: "1.0.0"
states: [normal, degrade, rollback, recover]
transitions:
- { from: normal, to: degrade, when: "gate_alert or drift_alert" }
- { from: degrade, to: rollback, when: "gate_critical or perf_critical" }
- { from: rollback,to: recover, when: "stable_prev_version_ready" }
- { from: recover, to: normal, when: "validate_pass and perf_ok" }
degrade:
strategies: ["robust_surrogate","tighten_gates","isolate_slices"]
rollback:
version_tag: "v1.2.3-lock"
verify: ["checksum","/validate","SLA/SLO"]
recover:
rollout: { canary_percent: 10, steps: 3, pause_s: 600 }
C. alerts.jsonl (sample)
IX. Anti-Patterns & Fixes
- Anti: reporting means only, no intervals/CIs → Fix: add U=k·u_c or quantile bands with convergence diagnostics.
- Anti: T_arr = ∫ n_eff / c_ref d ell (no parentheses) → Fix: use parenthesized unified form.
- Anti: drift detected but no degrade/rollback → Fix: bind automatic FSM actions and approval thresholds.
- Anti: rollback version unsigned/no checksum → Fix: require signature and checksum verification.
- Anti: path block missing d ell/delta_form → Fix: complete and equalize with n_eff before alert computation.
X. Cross-References
- Dataset Card: Ch. 7 (QC Gates), Ch. 8 (UQ/Cov), Ch. 11 (Bench/Score), Ch. 10 (API).
- Error Budget Card: Ch. 8/9 (intervals & thresholds).
- Pipeline Card: Ch. 7 (State/Idempotency/Fault Tolerance), Ch. 9 (Gates/Monitoring/Alerts), Ch. 12 (Outputs/Release).
- This volume: Ch. 6 (Training), Ch. 7 (UQ), Ch. 10 (Deployment Interfaces).
XI. Checklist
- monitoring_rules.yaml / rollback_fsm.yaml / alerts.jsonl stored and active.
- For path quantities, explicit gamma/measure/delta_form; p_dim = 1.0; alerts aligned with gates.
- Drift tests (data/concept) reproducible; degrade/rollback actions & approvals clearly defined and audited.
- Resource/performance monitoring aligned with Ch. 11; thresholds & regression strategy effective.
- /validate passed G1–G8; non-compliances tagged [Restricted] and handled; anchor coverage ≥ 90%.
Copyright & License (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright: Unless otherwise noted, the copyright of “Energy Filament Theory” (text, charts, illustrations, symbols, and formulas) belongs to the author “Guanglin Tu”.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may copy, redistribute, excerpt, adapt, and share for commercial or non‑commercial purposes with proper attribution.
Suggested attribution: Author: “Guanglin Tu”; Work: “Energy Filament Theory”; Source: energyfilament.org; License: CC BY 4.0.
First published: 2025-11-11|Current version:v5.1
License link:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/